The Pillars of the Earth by Ken Follett

Remember in elementary school when your third grade teacher taught you about writing a story and the parts of a plot? You probably saw a diagram that looked something like this:

The diagram, as I see it, for The Pillars of the Earth would look something like this:

Now, I’m not saying that professional writers should stick to an amateur creative method they were taught at age 8, but the deviation from the traditional plot form was so stark in The Pillars of the Earth that I found it particularly annoying. The story went something like this: John was a kid who dreamed of being a concert pianist. John was talented and took music lessons. He practiced and practiced. He found the field was very competitive, but he worked hard and persevered hoping to someday play at Carnegie Hall. Remember John? He once played a gig at Carnegie Hall.

Repeatedly during the novel, Follett would spend hundreds of pages building up to a climax, only to skip the climax and then spend about a sentence talking about how the climax happened. WTF?!

All of that irritation aside, the story itself was quite compelling. It is set in Medeival England with the Builder family. Tom Builder is a mason whose life dream is to build a Cathedral. There’s an antagonist named William who should have been killed on about page 5. I now break for one more criticism. My theory is that Follet wanted desparately for his readers to understand that William was one sick bastard who should be killed. In an effort to make this point, William is painted as a character who is obsessed with raping women. I can deal with a rape scene when it is integral to the storyline, but there must have been close to 10 rape scenes in this book. Was that necessary? I had a pretty damned good idea after rape scene number 1, that William should go to hell. I tolerated rape scene number 2, and thought—okay, I get it—he’s got a sick obsession. The remaining rape scenes were COMPLETELY unecessary. Don’t get it. Don’t want to get it.

Oops, I digress, back to the story. The book talks a lot about building, which I found quite interesting to read about measurements and styles and all of that. Also interesting, was learning about Medeival monastic life (according to Follett). The book contained love, broken hearts, pregnancies (both wanted and unwanted), a witch, marriage, kings, arson, attacks, defense, hope, the absense of hope, times of starvation and times of plenty. It is a great story, long but an easy read.

Favorite passages:
 

"Having faith in God did not mean sitting back and doing nothing. It meant believing that you would find success if you did your best hgonestly and energetically." pg.424


"She loved him because he had brought her back to life. She had been like a caterpillar in a cocoon, and he had drawn her out and shown her that she was a butterfly. She would have spent her entire life numb to the joys and pains of love, if he had not walked into her secret glade, and shared his story peoms with her, and kissed her so lightly, and then slowly, gently, awakened the love that lay dormant in her heart. He had been so patient, so tolerant, despite his youth. For that she would always love him." pg. 799

"Philip smiled. 'Knotty theological questions are the least worrying of problems, to me.' 'Why?' 'Because they will all be resolved in the hereafter, and meanwhile they can safely be shelved." pg. 946

If this were a movie, I’d rate it: R (for language and some pretty detailed sex scenes)

Overall Grade: C+

Would I recommend this to my friends? Yeah, a few--it is an easy read.

Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoevsky

Crime and Punishment is one of those books that was generally enjoyable to read each time I picked it up, but was never compelling enough to keep me awake past my bed-time reading. I actually finished the book a couple of weeks ago, but have been really unsure how I felt about it; therefore the delay in this post.

Crime and Punishment is the story of Rodion Romanovich Raskolnikov; a student who has dropped out of school due to lack of funding. He has studied philosophy in depth and has formulated the theory that certain people have the right to murder (he uses Napoleon as an example). Raskolnikov is destitute and has pawned all of his valuables to a cranky old pawnbroker named Alyona Ivanovna. Raskolnikov formulates a plan to murder Ivanova; his justification being that he could perform acts of kindness with her money, also he needed money for himself, his mother, and sister. Finally, he claims himself to be one of those who are authorized to murder.

After committing the crime, Raskolnikov suffers from a nervous breakdown and the remainder of the story tells of his friends and family, and their confusion over Raskolnikov’s state. Raskolnikov goes back and forth through periods of humility where he feels he must confess and then thinks perhaps he can go on in normal society.

Raskolnikov befriends Sonia, a young prostitute, who ultimately convinces him to confess and pay for his crime (prison in Siberia).

That’s basically how the Russian version of “and they lived happily ever after”.

I did enjoy the story—Raskolnikov’s mental struggles were interesting to ponder. I have to admit that I grew a little tired of them by the end though. The story was pretty predictable possessing few surprises, but overall I liked the story—after all, it is about a crazy person.

Favorite passages:

“What answer had your lecturer in Moscow to make to the question why he was forging notes? ‘Everybody is getting rich one way or another, so I want to make haste to get rich too.’ I don’t remember the exact words, but the upshot was that he wants money for nothing, without waiting or working! We’ve grown used to having everything ready-made, to walking on crutches, to having our food chewed for us.” Pg. 153 (huh, and that was in the mid 1800s...)

“She was an ugly little thing. I really don’t know what drew me to her then—I think it was because she was always ill. If she had been lame or hunchback, I believe I should have liked her better still.” Pg. 232

“…but yet she seems in a way to have liked my brutal frankness. She thought it showed I was unwilling to deceive her if I warned her like this beforehand and for a jealous woman, you know, that’s the first consideration.” Pg. 467

If this were a movie, I’d rate it: R

Overall Grade: C+

Would I recommend this to my friends? Some of them—those who like dark, depressing stories about mental issues.